To the editor: Trump’s decision to sue the Des Moines Register and pollster J. Ann Selzer seems to lack a solid legal foundation. The newspaper merely published poll results, free from any malice, as is their right. Similarly, the pollster reported her findings without any ill intent, also acting within her rights.
It’s likely that, once the case is dismissed—as it probably will be—the defendants could turn the tables on Trump with their own lawsuit. Filing for abuse of process and malicious prosecution, which are actionable in civil court, could be a fitting response since these actions are independent of any presidential powers and can proceed while Trump is still in office.
Such a move might finally teach Trump that retaliatory actions can backfire, potentially causing more headaches than they resolve.
Barry Rubin, Beverly Hills
…
To the editor: Pollster J. Ann Selzer laments being accused of meddling in elections without any evidence. Her poll’s surprising result might be considered a starting point, but lawsuits thrive on uncovering the truth—digging out that little “shred” of evidence.
Kip Dellinger, Santa Monica
…
To the editor: Your piece mentions Trump’s lawsuit against an Iowa pollster and newspaper, accusing them of manipulating a poll to favor his opponent in the recent election.
It’s fascinating to witness Trump pioneer a new category not just as a “sore loser,” but as a “sore winner.”
Ted Bacino, Palm Springs
…
To the editor: Election law expert Richard Hasen doesn’t foresee Trump’s lawsuit making much progress. Isn’t it part of Susie Wiles’ job as Trump’s esteemed chief of staff to dissuade her boss from pursuing such vindictive and potentially futile actions?
June Maguire, Mission Viejo
