Britain and Europe stand at a pivotal juncture, a crossroads that some describe with a slew of familiar phrases such as “watershed moment” or “paradigm shift.” Ever since Donald Trump embarked on his second term as President in January, the landscape has been dramatically altered. Commentators and diplomats alike agree that this transformation is irreversible. The pressing question now is how Britain and Europe will practically address these changes. Is this the time for Europe to assert itself as a key global player, or will it falter, leaving itself vulnerable to exploitation by larger, more aggressive powers?
Donald Trump is taking on three unprecedented challenges. He is trying to push Ukraine, a nation under siege for over three years, into accepting a “peace deal” dictated by him and Russia’s Vladimir Putin. In a sudden reversal of American policy, he’s also seeking to mend relations with Moscow, aiming to lift sanctions and kickstart joint economic ventures. Simultaneously, he’s informing Europeans that they must learn to fend for themselves, essentially saying the U.S. may no longer be a dependable ally, and even NATO, a cornerstone of transatlantic security for 76 years, might be expendable.
Most European leaders are understandably alarmed by these developments, despite a few dissenters on the fringes. They recognize that even without Trump’s unpredictability, a shift in US-Europe relations is unavoidable and necessary. French President Emmanuel Macron captured this sentiment last week, noting, “Europe’s destiny shouldn’t be shaped by Washington or Moscow.” He highlighted that while the war in Ukraine rages on, the U.S., a long-time partner, has shifted its stance. Europe, therefore, must enter an era of greater self-reliance.
For countries like Poland and the Baltic republics, NATO has always been a vital shield. Yet now, there’s a looming threat to its stability. Last year, Macron was accused of pacifying Putin, but he has since changed course. He now warns that Russian aggression poses a direct threat to both France and Europe. Demonstrating active leadership, Macron has proposed a phased ceasefire plan backed by Ukraine and has been engaging with Trump to promote a European “assurance force” in Ukraine.
In the midst of calls for Europe to “step up,” Germany took many by surprise with its bold decision to amend its Basic Law, allowing for substantial investments in defense and infrastructure. It’s a significant shift for a nation traditionally wary of debt. Friedrich Merz, known for his conservative fiscal stance, is now advocating for European independence from the U.S. and has committed to sustaining military aid for Ukraine.
European leaders like Donald Tusk have also risen to the challenge. Poland’s Prime Minister faces a difficult situation, feeling betrayed by Trump’s stance. NATO’s weakening is a significant concern for Poland and the Baltic states.
Similarly, Keir Starmer understands the significance of this historical moment. He has been working diligently to counter Trump’s more reckless impulses. His recent remarks in the Commons, criticizing the US vice-president’s uninformed comments, showed his willingness to stand up against irresponsible narratives. Starmer’s collaboration with EU leaders, especially post-Brexit, is a positive development that extends beyond defense and security.
The recent EU summit centered on the daunting task of lessening Europe’s dependence on the U.S., bolstering defense, and aiding Ukraine. As often happens in Brussels, outcomes were mixed. There’s a commitment to increased defense spending, but its implementation hinges on national governments’ willingness to incur debt. Predictably, Europe is divided; Hungary obstructed a united stance on Ukraine. Still, many NATO members, including Britain, are upping their defense budgets, and non-EU nations like Norway are boosting aid to Kyiv.
Europe is making strides. If it remains committed, it will eventually be better poised to deter Russian aggression independently. However, uncertainty looms over Europe’s immediate ability to counteract a potential Trump-Putin alliance. Trump’s reluctance to offer Kyiv firm security guarantees post-conflict and his suspension of military support embolden Russia, leading to intensified attacks and civilian casualties. The prospect of a just peace seems ever more distant.
If you have thoughts on the topics discussed here and would like to share them in a letter of up to 250 words for potential publication, feel free to email us at [email protected].
